_
Hope
Links
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The rise of Leni Riefenstahl
WHERE THERE’S A WILL
At thirty-three, Riefenstahl was a strikingly attractive if hectic figure, with dark hair, chiselled features, and an obsidian gaze intensified by eyes set slightly too close together. Their look of adoration in the Führer’s presence, and (as her rivals saw it) his indulgence of her every whim, fuelled rumors of a Valhallan romance, which heightened curiosity about her in Germany and abroad. Time might have devoted its cover to a Winter Olympian like Sonja Henie, the Norwegian figure-skating champion, but the building controversy over the August games, which represented a windfall of legitimacy for the Reich, decided the editors on a more electric candidate: “Hitler’s Leni Riefenstahl.” The sensational portrait that they chose, a departure from the usual head shot of a statesman or grande dame, is reproduced in a first-rate new biography of Riefenstahl, by Steven Bach, “Leni: The Life and Work of Leni Riefenstahl” (Knopf; $30), though without mention of the photographer, Martin Munkacsi.
I wrote in my review of that film: "If Leni Riefenstahl had done nothing notable before the age of 60, what a wonderful life we would say she had lived since then." Then in her early 90s, she was the world's oldest active scuba diver, and at the end of a day of diving, we see her walk down a pier with two men--the captain, and Horst, her younger companion and cinematographer--and "the body language says everything. The two men walk ahead, carrying gear, engaged in conversation. She walks behind them, alone, carrying her own gear and oxygen tank. They don't lend her a hand, or offer to carry the tank for her, and what this says is that, at 91, they do not think she needs special consideration. She's one of the guys."
- https://www.rogerebert.com/interviews/german-filmmaker-riefenstahl-dies-at-101
The Blue Light (1932)
She wrote, directed, produced, and starred in this mystical mountain fable. The film featured filters and lighting effects that would later define her propaganda aesthetic. Hitler saw it and reportedly said, "That is the ultimate German woman."
https://gemini.google.com/share/0c8afe1f6608
OLYMPIA (1938)
It was the first documentary feature film of the Olympic Games ever made. Many advanced motion picture techniques, which later became industry standards but which were groundbreaking at the time, were employed —including unusual camera angles, smash cuts, extreme close-ups, placing tracking shot rails within the bleachers, and the like. The techniques employed are almost universally admired, but the film is controversial due to its political context. Nevertheless, the film appears on many lists of the greatest films of all time.
Cinema, Sports, and the Specter of Propaganda
Directed by Leni Riefenstahl, Olympia is widely considered the most influential sports documentary in film history. Released in two parts—Fest der Völker (Festival of Nations) and Fest der Schönheit (Festival of Beauty)—it documented the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin. While it remains a technical masterpiece that defined the visual language of modern sports coverage, its legacy is inextricably tied to the Nazi regime that funded it.
Technical Innovations and Cinematography
Riefenstahl and her crew of over 40 cameramen pioneered techniques that are now industry standards. Prior to Olympia, sports filming was largely static and newsreel-style.
Camera Movement: Riefenstahl utilized tracking shots by laying rails alongside the track to follow runners at eye level. She also used "trench shots," digging pits for cameramen to achieve dramatic low-angle perspectives of jumpers and throwers against the sky.
Underwater Photography: The film featured the first significant use of underwater cameras in a sports context, particularly during the high-diving sequences, capturing the transition of the human body from air to water.
Aerial and Micro Shots: To gain new perspectives, cameras were attached to static balloons (forerunners to the "Spidercam") and telephoto lenses were used to capture extreme close-ups of athletes' strained muscles and expressions.
Editing and Pacing: Riefenstahl spent two years editing over 250 miles of film. She focused on the rhythm of movement rather than just the results of the competition, creating "symphonic" sequences where the editing matched the tempo of the music.
The Jesse Owens Paradox
One of the most debated aspects of the film is its extensive coverage of African-American track star Jesse Owens.
Heroic Depiction: Despite the Nazi "master race" ideology, Riefenstahl’s film treats Owens as a cinematic hero, showing his record-breaking victories in great detail and capturing his charm and athleticism.
Historical Context: While Riefenstahl claimed this proved her artistic independence from Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels (who allegedly wanted the "non-Aryan" victories cut), historians note that the inclusion of international victors served the "soft propaganda" goal of making Germany appear fair-minded and hospitable to the world.
Controversies and Legacy
Funding: Though Riefenstahl claimed the film was commissioned by the IOC, it was revealed post-war that the film was entirely financed by the Nazi government via the shell company Olympia Film GmbH.
Propaganda vs. Art: The film is often described as "fascist aesthetics"—a glorification of the perfect, disciplined body and the "cult of the leader." However, its brilliance is such that it is still studied in film schools worldwide for its sheer mastery of the medium.
Modern Influence: Every televised Olympic broadcast today—from the slow-motion replays to the sweeping tracking shots and the emphasis on the athlete’s personal drama—owes its foundational "visual DNA" to Olympia.
TRIUMPH OF THE WILL (1935)
MORE ABOUT FILM
Overview
Triumph of the Will, released in 1935 and directed by Leni Riefenstahl, is a landmark of propaganda filmmaking. It chronicles the 1934 Nazi Party Congress in Nuremberg, attended by more than 700,000 Nazi supporters. While the film is widely condemned for its promotion of National Socialism, it is simultaneously studied for its revolutionary cinematic techniques.
Historical Context
The film was commissioned by Adolf Hitler shortly after he rose to power. The 1934 Nuremberg Rally was specifically designed not just for those present, but for the cameras. Riefenstahl had a crew of 172 people, including 36 cameramen and 9 aerial photographers.
The primary objective was to demonstrate the "rebirth" of Germany as a world power and to present Hitler as a messianic figure who could provide order and strength to a nation recovering from the First World War and economic depression.
The Cult of Personality: The film focuses heavily on Hitler’s expressions, gestures, and the adoring reactions of the public.
Order vs. Chaos: The precise geometric formations of the soldiers and workers symbolize the "new order" the Nazi party promised.
The Myth of Unity: The film minimizes individual identity in favor of the collective, showing different regions of Germany "uniting" under one leader.
But when the German film industry emptied itself of its great talents in the wake of the advent of Adolph Hitler in 1933, Riefenstahl refused to join the river of cinematic refugees to France, England, and the U.S.. She would forever after claim to be "apolitical," but her first meeting with Adolph Hitler, in 1932, was propitious. Hitler was an admirer of The Blue Light, and presciently recognized the power of the cinema as a mass persuasion instrument. Riefenstahl made a short film about the 1933 Nazi party rallies in Nuremberg; though she had only a few days to prepare before the event, the film, released as "Victory of Faith," was an ambitious and aesthetically advanced film. Now, with considerably more time to plan, Riefenstahl took over the planning of a film about the 1934 rally originally begun by documentarian Walter Ruttmann. What Ruttmann had planned as an explicitly rhetorical film, Riefenstahl saw as a cinematic paean to the race mythologies of Nazism, expressed through the geometry of its mass rituals and the solitary figure of its strange, strutting god, Adolph Hitler. Although it was long alleged that Riefenstahl had a hand in planning the massive rallies themselves, helping to design their staging so that the event would be more photogenic, Hitler's minister of the interior and court architect Albert Speer denied this many years later; the striking Art Deco blockiness of the outdoor rallies, with their searchlights turned upward like pillars of fire, was his own, and the only major concession to Riefenstahl's crew was the provision of a huge elevator that allowed for her spectacular crane shots.Triumph of the Will, like The Birth of a Nation, presents the great conundrum of art: can art be both morally reprehensible, and yet "great"? Riefenstahl was imprisoned by the Allies after the war, and then released, partly because no one could figure out if a film could be an instrument of war. Riefenstahl was adamant; she had been concerned with matters of form, not politics. But she was never to be rehabilitated by the German film industry, and in her later years, she developed an astonishing second career as photographer; her underwater photography, and her often disturbing portraits of the Nuba tribe have the same sort of formal clarity as Triumph of the Will, and its sister, the great sports film Olympia. Shortly before her death at the age of 100, Ray Miller's documentary The Wonderful, Horrible Life of Leni Riefenstahl brought the deep paradox of Riefenstahl back to screen center, as well as her obliviousness to the consequences of artistic work in the service of a politically psychotic regime. Another documentary, also of another old woman of the Nazi years, Blind Spot, offered a far more anguished portrait of regret and self-analysis, that of Hitler's secretary, Traudl Junge. Riefenstahl imagined that she could will away her complicity in madness, while Junge, in the last months of her life, sought to know herself better through analysis of that complicity. For Leni Riefenstahl, Triumph of the Will is troubled testament to a life where art and politics mingled in an ethical Gordian knot of profound meaning for everyone who sees her work.
This movie is fascinating in so many different ways: As the story of an extraordinary life, as the reconstruction of the career of one of the greatest of film artists, as the record of an ideological debate, as a portrait of an amazing old woman.

.jpeg)














.jpeg)




