Skip to main content

_

Notes from Underground

  And, indeed, I will ask on my own account here, an idle question: which is better—cheap happiness or exalted sufferings? Well, which is better?---Fyodor Dostoevsky ---Notes from Underground Fyodor Dostoevsky ---Notes from Underground Even now, so many years later, all this is somehow a very evil memory. I have many evil memories now, but ... hadn’t I better end my “Notes” here? I believe I made a mistake in beginning to write them, anyway I have felt ashamed all the time I’ve been writing this story; so it’s hardly literature so much as a corrective punishment.  Why, to tell long stories, showing how I have spoiled my life through morally rotting in my corner, through lack of fitting environment, through divorce from real life, and rankling spite in my underground world, would certainly not be interesting; a novel needs a hero, and all the traits for an anti-hero are expressly gathered together here, and what matters most, it all produces an unpleasant impression, for we are...

Hope

To be human is to be a miracle of evolution conscious of its own miraculousness — a consciousness beautiful and bittersweet, for we have paid for it with a parallel awareness not only of our fundamental improbability but of our staggering fragility, of how physiologically precarious our survival is and how psychologically vulnerable our sanity. To make that awareness bearable, we have evolved a singular faculty that might just be the crowning miracle of our consciousness: hope.-- Erich Fromm


Glengarry Glen Ross (1992)




 
Few contemporary writers for the stage, TV and cinema have come close to David Mamet for the quality, quantity and variety of their work. Among its peaks, and characteristic of his highly individual ear for American demotic at its most creatively and colourfully obscene, is Glengarry Glen Ross. The title comes from the dubious parcels of real estate in Arizona and Florida that its ruthless characters sell to gullible buyers from a branch office in Chicago. 

Mamet wrote the play in 1983 and sent it to his mentor, Harold Pinter, saying he didn’t know how to bring it to a satisfactory end. “It’s perfect, stage it,” Pinter replied, and it was put on in London at the National Theatre with a British cast before having its Broadway premiere the following year, when it received the Pulitzer prize. It took nearly eight years to reach the screen under the direction of James Foley, but by then had attracted one of the best American casts ever assembled: Jack Lemmon, Al Pacino, Alan Arkin and Ed Harris as the salesmen desperately hanging on to their jobs and Kevin Spacey as the chilly branch manager who despises them.




In his screenplay Mamet made only one change to an all-male play that takes place on two sets (the office and a nearby Chinese restaurant) during a special sales drive. But it’s crucial. Early in the first act he introduces a demonic visitor from head office who tells them in the most brutal terms their jobs are in serious jeopardy. In the cast list he’s called Blake, but he tells them “Fuck You – that’s my name!”, and he’s played with an indelibly stunning force by Alec Baldwin.

The characters lie, steal and exploit, deceiving themselves as much as their sad clients. (One of their dupes is Jonathan Pryce, who in the 2007 West End revival was to play the burnt-out salesman Shelley Levene, the role taken by Jack Lemmon in the movie.) They’re dishonest, double-dealing tricksters who invite our sympathy as victims of a merciless, unforgiving system while winning our grudging admiration for the pride and cunning they show in the artistry of their deceptions. It’s an image of a society that Mamet despises and yet finds fascinating, though recent interviews suggest he’s now inclined to view the capitalist system more sympathetically than he did in the 80s.












Glengarry Glen Ross is a 1992 American drama film adapted by David Mamet from his 1984 Pulitzer Prize-winning play. Directed by James Foley, the film is renowned for its razor-sharp dialogue, powerhouse performances, and its bleak, cynical depiction of the American Dream through the lens of high-stakes real estate sales.






  1. First Prize: A Cadillac Eldorado.

  2. Second Prize: A set of steak knives.

  3. Third Prize: You’re fired.






The Iconic Cast

The film is often cited as having one of the greatest ensemble casts in cinema history:

Actor

Character

Role Description

Al Pacino

Ricky Roma

The office's "top closer." Smooth, charismatic, and predatory.

Jack Lemmon

Shelley "The Machine" Levene

A once-great salesman in a tragic, desperate slump.

Alec Baldwin

Blake

The ruthless executive who delivers the "ABC" speech.

Ed Harris

Dave Moss

The bitter, aggressive salesman who instigates the heist.

Alan Arkin

George Aaronow

The timid, insecure salesman constantly worried about his job.

Kevin Spacey

John Williamson

The cold, corporate office manager who follows rules over empathy.

Jonathan Pryce

James Lingk

The "mark"—a meek man seduced by Roma’s sales pitch.







Critical Legacy

Despite being a box office disappointment upon release, the film has achieved massive cult status. Al Pacino received an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor, and Jack Lemmon's performance is widely regarded as one of the finest of his late career. Today, it is frequently used in business schools and sales training as a cautionary tale of toxic corporate culture.







Play vs. Film: Key Differences

While the film is a very faithful adaptation, Mamet made strategic changes to heighten the cinematic experience:

  1. The Addition of Blake: In the play, the "contest" is mentioned but the character of Blake does not exist. His inclusion provides a face for the "Mitch and Murray" corporate overlords.

  2. Expanded Setting: The play is strictly divided into two locations: a Chinese restaurant and the office. The film adds scenes in the rain, in cars, and at the characters' homes to emphasize their isolation and the oppressive atmosphere of the city.

  3. The Ending: The film provides a slightly more definitive, albeit crushing, resolution to Shelley Levene's arc compared to the more ambiguous ending of the stage version.




Popular Posts