A tantalising screenplay keeps the audience guessing in Justine Triet’s gripping French drama in which superb lead actor Sandra Hüller plays a woman suspected of her husband’s murder
It turns out that there’s still life in the courtroom drama if it’s a marital one, too. Justine Triet’s “Anatomy of a Fall” starts with a traditional mystery but becomes an analysis of a different kind of fall than the literal one at its center. It’s about the decline of a partnership and how often these marital falls can happen in slow-motion, over years of resentments and betrayals. At its center is a stunning performance from Sandra Hüller, possibly the best of the year, as a woman who finds herself in the middle of a nightmare when a French court indicts her for the murder of her husband. This movie won the Palme d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival this year because it’s more than a mere mystery—it’s an examination of a marriage from all angles while embedding the idea that we can never fully comprehend anyone but ourselves. It’s a daring, long film that sometimes feels too chilly and self-indulgent, but it builds to a series of scenes that hit like a punch. Or when a fight with a partner goes a little too far.
Hüller plays Sandra, who is introduced by giving an interview about her life as a famous author—Triet’s film plays fascinatingly with the idea that writers inherently use the people around them in a way that makes them unique, making the profession of her protagonist important (and I don't think it's coincidental her lead couple share the names of their performers). As the interview goes on and gets arguably a bit flirtatious, loud music begins to pump from above in this remote, snow-surrounded cabin in the French Alps. It’s her husband Samuel (Samuel Theis), playing an instrumental version of 50 Cent’s “P.I.M.P.” of all things. On repeat. And louder and louder. He’s aggressively trying to derail the interview, and he succeeds. The interviewer leaves, and their son Daniel (Milo Machado Graner) takes the dog Snoop for a long walk. When he returns, he finds Samuel in the snow, a bloody wound in his head. Did he fall from the attic in which he was working? Did he jump? Or was he pushed?
For the next two-and-a-half hours, “Anatomy of a Fall” almost procedurally details the investigation and trial around Samuel’s death. Every decision made not just that day but over much of their marriage is scrutinized by people who have never met Sandra, Samuel, or Daniel. Rarely has a film captured how much personal baggage comes flying out when a death is ruled inconclusive. Samuel’s therapist testifies that he wasn’t suicidal, but, of course, he only saw what Samuel wanted to show him. The interviewer is asked to comment on the state of a woman she just met that day. What does she know about their lives? We only ever see part of a person’s mental state. At times, it feels like Sandra’s personality is on trial. Then again, some evidence that she’s responsible is pretty compelling.
"The closer we look, the less we know in Justine Triet’s masterful Palme d’Or–winning Anatomy of a Fall, an eerily riveting courtroom thriller that examines the line where truth becomes fiction and fiction becomes truth. When Sandra Voyter (a transfixing Sandra Hüller), a writer who turns the material of her life into autofiction, is put on trial for the suspicious death by defenestration—or was it suicide?—of her husband, it opens up an inquiry that will turn a troubled home inside out. Tapping into the minimalist intensity of a chamber drama—and using intricate, elliptical editing—Triet constructs a mystery that is ultimately less about a death than about the hidden lives we lead."
The Inaccessibility of Truth
The film posits that "the truth" is often a narrative we choose to believe rather than an objective fact. During the trial, blood spatter experts, psychologists, and lawyers all interpret the same evidence to tell completely different stories. As the court monitor tells Daniel: "When we lack proof, we must decide."
The "Anatomy" of a Marriage
The "fall" in the title refers to more than just the physical drop from the attic. It refers to the collapse of a partnership. The trial exposes the power dynamics, professional jealousies, and the unequal distribution of domestic labor. Sandra is essentially put on trial not just for murder, but for being a "difficult" woman who refuses to conform to the role of a grieving, submissive widow.
The Ambiguous Ending (Spoilers)
Is Sandra Guilty?
The film ends with Sandra’s acquittal, but notably, it does not provide a flashback showing what "actually" happened.
Daniel's Role: The verdict is ultimately decided by Daniel. After hearing the brutal reality of his parents' marriage, he chooses to believe his mother, providing a testimony that seals the case.
The Final Shot: The movie ends not with a celebration, but with Sandra exhausted and haunted. When she returns home, she hugs Snoop. The "victory" is hollow because, while she is legally innocent, her private life has been permanently decimated.
Anatomy of a Fall won the Palme d'Or at Cannes and the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay. It is cited as a landmark in the "legal thriller" genre for its intellectual depth and its refusal to provide a tidy, Hollywood resolution.
.jpg)