Skip to main content

_

Notes from Underground

  And, indeed, I will ask on my own account here, an idle question: which is better—cheap happiness or exalted sufferings? Well, which is better?---Fyodor Dostoevsky ---Notes from Underground Fyodor Dostoevsky ---Notes from Underground Even now, so many years later, all this is somehow a very evil memory. I have many evil memories now, but ... hadn’t I better end my “Notes” here? I believe I made a mistake in beginning to write them, anyway I have felt ashamed all the time I’ve been writing this story; so it’s hardly literature so much as a corrective punishment.  Why, to tell long stories, showing how I have spoiled my life through morally rotting in my corner, through lack of fitting environment, through divorce from real life, and rankling spite in my underground world, would certainly not be interesting; a novel needs a hero, and all the traits for an anti-hero are expressly gathered together here, and what matters most, it all produces an unpleasant impression, for we are...

Hope

To be human is to be a miracle of evolution conscious of its own miraculousness — a consciousness beautiful and bittersweet, for we have paid for it with a parallel awareness not only of our fundamental improbability but of our staggering fragility, of how physiologically precarious our survival is and how psychologically vulnerable our sanity. To make that awareness bearable, we have evolved a singular faculty that might just be the crowning miracle of our consciousness: hope.-- Erich Fromm


Magnolia (1999)

 


“We may be through with the past, but the past is never through with us.”

With Magnolia, Paul Thomas Anderson establishes himself as one of the most exciting and distinctive directors around.

His new film contains the convulsive emotional hurt and sweeping visual style that characterised Hard Eight and Boogie Nights, and is an anthology of broken lives - each interleaving with the other in a lattice of ill omen and disquiet. It is an ensemble picture like Tarantino's Pulp Fiction or Altman's Short Cuts but, with the device of a deadpan prologue about the nature of coincidence, makes manifest the curious nature of its own very individual world. It is an excursion into the universe of Ripley's Believe-It-Or-Not urban myth that prepares us - just about - for the uproarious biblical finale with which Anderson spectacularly discharges the unbearable tension and anxiety which has built up over the preceding three hours.

Among the characters are Earl Partridge (Jason Robards), a wealthy television producer, very ill and breathing his last: grouchy, unpleasant, in a lot of pain and profoundly unreconciled to his impending death. He is attended by Phil, a male nurse played by Philip Seymour Hoffman - an actor whose name on the billboard always demands attention. As it happens, this is a reserved and almost reticent performance by Hoffman, who is the only character not eaten up with angst and self-doubt.

Earl is also attended by his young wife, Linda, played with raw anger and self-loathing by Julianne Moore. Linda is experiencing a horrifying emotional about-face in her relations with Earl: she married him, lovelessly, for money but now realises she has actually fallen in love with him. She has been surprised, not by joy, but by the most terrible anguish.




Earl produced a long-running TV general knowledge quiz show of stupendous awfulness called What Do Kids Know?, which pits a team of grown-ups against kid prodigies and is an inspired metaphor for the inter-generational incomprehension and rancour that pervades the film. The quizmaster himself is Jimmy Gator, played by the incomparable Philip Baker Hall, whose face has solidified like lumps and rivulets of molten lava into the weary face he now presents to the world: wrecked and ruined and haggard (there is actually a clever sequence showing the show's gestation, and showing Gator getting older), and grotesquely inappropriate to the icky, perky little catchphrases the show has accumulated over the years.

Perhaps the outstanding performance is Tom Cruise as Earl's estranged son, the deliciously slimy Frank Mackey, a "motivational speaker" who runs a series of sex-advice seminars which are simply Nuremberg rallies for single guys. Entitled Seduce and Destroy, his sales pitch is a misogynist demagoguery, with individual lessons on "How to Turn That 'Friend' Into a Sperm Receptacle" and his message is that women must be subjected and humiliated before they do it to you, and that all sexual relations must be put on a permanent war footing.

With the slogan "Respect the Cock and Tame the Cunt", Cruise is a mixture of Hugh Hefner, Billy Graham and Adolf Hitler, and this strutting, ranting creation is something to put alongside the brutish Chad in Neil LaBute's In the Company of Men or Matthew Broderick's nice teacher Mr McAllister in Alexander Payne's Election. Once again, it shows that in American cinema and culture, sexual relations have, in a sense, become the new cold war. (Frank is evidently a magnification of real life sex hucksters, but it cannot be long before someone starts Seduce and Destroy for real. I suggest Paul Thomas Anderson copyrights and suppresses the whole horribly catchy idea the way anti-racist groups have bagged "hate.com".)




The poetic keynote to the film comes from Earl's grizzled death-bed lament about "the goddam regret". Don't be afraid to regret, he says, "use that regret any way you want." Magnolia is a dark and bitter poetry of regret, enunciated in a theatre of regret, in the grammar of regret, and clothed in the style and rhetoric of regret. It is a great wail of regret, with the terrible admission that real lives can be played out in a drama of anguish and waste, and that looking this full in the face at the end requires existential courage of the sort few of us have.

Magnolia is a sprawling, howling miasma of strangeness, and some may find incontinence and indiscipline in its sheer length and Anderson's love of bringing the soundtrack up to ear-bashing levels over the dialogue - particularly in the opening 10 to 15 minutes. But there is a compelling darkness in Anderson's film, a Mood Indigo of desperation.














The Ensemble and Plot Structure

      1. The film weaves together nine major storylines over the course of a single, rainy day in Los Angeles. The characters are connected by blood, proximity, or the "What Do Kids Know?" television quiz show.

        Character

        Actor

        Connection / Struggle

        Frank T.J. Mackey

        Tom Cruise

        A misogynistic pick-up artist reconciling with his dying father.

        Phil Parma

        Philip Seymour Hoffman

        A compassionate hospice nurse caring for Earl Partridge.

        Linda Partridge

        Julianne Moore

        The trophy wife of Earl, unraveling under guilt and addiction.

        "Quiz Kid" Donnie Smith

        William H. Macy

        A former child prodigy now desperate for love and money for braces.

        Officer Jim Kurring

        John C. Reilly

        A lonely, deeply moral cop trying to do the right thing.

        Claudia Wilson Gator

        Melora Walters

        A cocaine addict haunted by childhood trauma involving her father.

        Jimmy Gator

        Philip Baker Hall

        The cancer-stricken host of the quiz show, seeking redemption.

        Stanley Spector

        Jeremy Blackman

        The current "Quiz Kid" who is being exploited by his father.

        Earl Partridge

        Jason Robards

        A dying media mogul whose past abandonment of his family fuels the plot.




Central Themes

"The Past is Never Through With Us"

      1. The film’s central thesis is articulated by the narrator and echoed by the characters: we may try to outrun our history, but our traumas and choices eventually catch up. Most of the characters are suffering from the "sins of the father"—whether it’s Frank Mackey’s abandonment, Claudia’s abuse, or Donnie’s exploited childhood.

Coincidence vs. Fate

      1. The film opens with three "strange tales" of incredible coincidence (narrated by Ricky Jay). This sets the stage for a world where the line between random chance and divine intervention is blurred. The film argues that while life is chaotic, there is a "mysterious, inscrutable holding" that binds us all together.

The Fragility of Masculinity

      1. Much of the film deconstructs the "tough" or "successful" male archetype. Frank Mackey’s "Seduce and Destroy" persona is revealed to be a defensive mask for a wounded boy, while the patriarchs Earl and Jimmy are physically rotting away from cancer—a metaphor for the toxic legacies they leave behind.







The Soundtrack (Aimee Mann & Jon Brion)

      1. The film was famously inspired by the lyrics of Aimee Mann. Her songs, particularly "Save Me" and "Wise Up," act as the emotional glue of the movie. In one of the most iconic (and surreal) sequences, the entire ensemble cast begins to sing along to "Wise Up" in their respective locations, breaking the fourth wall to acknowledge their shared despair.

Cinematography

      1. Robert Elswit’s camera is famously restless. The film features incredible long takes, such as the sequence following the "What Do Kids Know?" crew through the studio. This kinetic movement mirrors the escalating tension of the characters’ lives.







The Ending: The Frog Rain

      1. The film’s climax features an actual deluge of frogs falling from the sky—a reference to Exodus 8:2.

        • Literal Meaning: In the context of the film, it is a "Fortean" event—highly improbable but historically documented.

        • Symbolic Meaning: It acts as a divine "reset button." The absurdity of the event forces the characters to stop their spiraling and "let go" of their pride, shame, and secrets. It levels the playing field, proving that in a world this strange, anything (including forgiveness) is possible.






Popular Posts